Syllabus/achievement requirements

Notes:

• All literature is available online. You'll find it by searching on ub.uio.no (must be on UiO network or via kiosk.uio.no)

Required reading:

1. Ahuja, G. et al. (2008), ¡°Moving beyond Schumpeter: management research on the determinants of technological innovation¡±, The Academy of Management Annals, 2:1-98.
2. Arundel, A., Casali, L., & Hollanders, H. (2015). How European public sector agencies innovate: The use of bottom-up, policy-dependent and knowledge-scanning innovation methods. Research Policy, 44(7), 1271-1282.
3. Boswell, C. & Smith, K. (2017), Rethinking policy ¡®impact¡¯: four models of research-policy relations, Palgrave Communications, 3(44). Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-017-0042-z
4. Brynjolfson, E. & McAfee, A., 2014, The second machine age: work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. Boston: MIT Press, chapter one. Available here: http://secondmachineage.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/SecondMachineAge_Ch1.pdf
5. Davis, J. P. (2016). The group dynamics of interorganizational relationships: Collaborating with multiple partners in innovation ecosystems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(4), 621-661.
6. Etzkowitz, H. & Loet Leydesdorff (2000), The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and ¡®Mode 2¡¯ to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government relations, Research Policy, 29:109-123.
7. Feldman, M. S. (2000). Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change. Organization Science, 11 (6), 611-629.
8. Flanagan, K. & Uyarra, E. (2016) Four dangers in innovation policy studies ¨C and how to avoid them, Industry and Innovation, 23:2, 177-188, DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2016.1146126
9. Garud, R., P. Tuertscher & A. van de Ven. (2013), ¡°Perspectives on innovation processes¡±, The Academy of Management Annals, 7:775-819.
10. Geels, F. W. (2014). Regime Resistance against Low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing Politics and Power into the Multi-Level Perspective. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(5), 21-40.
11. Geels, F. W. (2014). Reconceptualising the co-evolution of firms-in-industries and their environments: Developing an inter-disciplinary Triple Embeddedness Framework. Research Policy, 43(2), 261-277. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.006
12. Geels, F. W., Sovacool, B. K., Schwanen, T., & Sorrell, S. (2017). Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization. Science, 357(6357), 1242-1244. doi:10.1126/science.aao3760
13. George, J. (2008). Creativity in Organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 439-477.
14. Gibbert, M., Scranton, P. (2009). Constraints as sources of radical innovation? Insights from jet propulsion development. Management & Organizational history, 4(4), 385-399.
15. Granstrand, O. (2005), Innovation and intellectual property rights. In Fagerberg, J. et al., Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available online at: https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199286805-e-10
16. Grubler, A. (2012). Energy transitions research: Insights and cautionary tales. Energy Policy, 50(Supplement C), 8-16.
17. Gulbrandsen, M. et al. (2015), Emerging hybrid practices in public-private research centres, Public Administration, 93:363-379.
18. Gulbrandsen, M. & H?iland, G. (2019), Better together? A critical discussion of the relationship between research and innovation in policy and practice. Manuscript under review.
19. Hockerts, K., & W¨¹stenhagen, R. (2010). Greening Goliaths versus emerging Davids - Theorizing about the role of incumbents and new entrants in sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 481-492
20. Jeppesen, L.B. & Frederiksen, L., 2006, Why Do Users Contribute to Firm-Hosted User Communities? The Case of Computer-Controlled Music Instruments, Organization Science, 17:45-63.
21. Kivimaa, P., & Kern, F. (2016). Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 45(1), 205¨C217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008
22. Malerba, F. (2005): ¡°Sectoral systems: How and why innovation differs across sectors¡±, in Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. and Nelson, R. (Eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Innovation.
23. Markard, J. (2018). The next phase of the energy transition and its implications for research and policy. Nature Energy, 3(8), 628-633. doi:10.1038/s41560-018-0171-7
24. Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41, 955-967.
25. Mazzucato, M. (2013), The Entrepreneurial State. London: Anthem Press.
26. O¡¯Reilly, C. A. & Tushman, M. (2013). Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future. Academy of Management Perspectives (you can use the open access version online).
27. Osborne, S.P. and L. Brown. 2011. ¡®Innovation, Public Policy and Public Services Delivery in the UK: The Word that Would Be King?¡¯, Public Administration, 89, 4, 1335¨C50
28. Owen, R. et al. (2012), Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society, Science and Public Policy, 39:751-760.
29. Parmigiani, A., & Rivera-Santos, M. (2011). Clearing a path through the forest: A meta-review of interorganizational relationships. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1108-1136
30. Penfield, T. et al. (2014), Assessment, evaluations, and definitions of research impact: A review. Research Evaluation, 23:21-32.
31. Perez, C. 2016, Capitalism, technology & a green global golden age: The role of history in helping to shape the future
32. Perkmann, M. et al. (2013), Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university¨Cindustry relations. Research Policy, 42:423-442.
33. Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of management review, 19(1), 90-118.
34. Rip, A., & Kemp, R. (1998). Technological change. Human choice and climate change, 2, 327-99.
35. Rosenbloom, D. (2019). A clash of socio-technical systems: Exploring actor interactions around electrification and electricity trade in unfolding low-carbon pathways for Ontario. Energy Research & Social Science, 49, 219-232. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.10.015
36. Siegel, D.S. & Wright, M. (2015), Academic entrepreneurship: time for a rethink? British Journal of Management, 26:582-595.
37. Stilgoe, J. et al. (2013), Developing a framework for responsible innovation, Research Policy, 42:1568-1580.
38. Teece, D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal. 18(7), 509-533.
39. Thune, Taran Mari & Mina, Andrea (2016). Hospitals as innovators in the health-care system: A literature review and research agenda. Research Policy.  ISSN 0048-7333.  45(8), s 1545- 1557.
40. Turnheim, B., & Geels, F. W. (2012). Regime destabilisation as the flipside of energy transitions: Lessons from the history of the British coal industry (1913¨C1997). Energy Policy, 50(Supplement C), 35-49.
41. Unsworth, K. (2001). Unpacking Creativity. The Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 289-297.
42. Vohora, A., M. Wright and A. Lockett (2004), Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies, Research Policy, 33:147-175.
43. Von Hippel, E., 2017, Free Innovation. Boston: MIT Press, chapter one. The Kindle version is free and the whole book is available as an open access pdf at its web page: https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/free-innovation.
44. Weber, K. M. & Rohracher, H. (2012) Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change - Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ¡®failures¡¯ framework, Research Policy 41 (2012) 1037¨C 1047.

Recommended reading:

45. Greenhalgh, T. et al. (2005), Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review, Social Science and Medicine, 61:417-430.
46. Greenhalgh, T. et al. (2005), Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review, Social Science and Medicine, 61:417-430.
47. Donovan, C., (2011), State of the art in assessing research impact, Research Evaluation, 20:175-179.
48. Spaapen, J. & van Drooge, L. (2011), Introducing ¡®productive interactions¡¯ in social impact assessment, Research Evaluation, 20:211-218.
49. OSIRIS blogs: https://www.sv.uio.no/tik/english/research/centre/osiris/osirisblog/measuring-impact.html
50. OSIRIS blogs: https://www.sv.uio.no/tik/english/research/centre/osiris/osirisblog/resinpolicy.html
51. Bekkers, R. and I.M. Bodas Freitas (2008), Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? Research Policy, 37 1837¨C1853.
52. Murmann, J.P. (2000), Knowledge and competitive advantage in the synthetic dye industry, 1850-1914: The coevolution of firms, technology and national institutions in Great Britain, Germany, and the United States, Enterprise & Society, 1:699-704.
53. Rosenberg, N. & R. Nelson, 1994, American universities and technical advance in industry, Research Policy, 23:323-348.
54. Thune, T. et al., 2014, Noder i kunnskapsnettverket. NIFU-rapport 23/2014.
55. Whitley, R., 2002, Developing innovative competences: the role of institutional frameworks, Industrial and Corporate Change, 11:497-528.
56. Etzkowitz, H. (1998), The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university¨Cindustry linkages, Research Policy, 27(8):823¨C33.
57. Grimaldi, R., M. Kenney, D.S. Siegel & M. Wright, 2011, 30 years after Bayh-Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship, Research Policy, 40:1045-1057.
58. Tuunainen, J. (2005), Contesting a Hybrid Firm at a Traditional University, Social Studies of Science, 35:173¨C210.
59. Von Schomberg, Rene ( 2013). "A vision of responsible innovation". In: R. Owen, M. Heintz and J Bessant (eds.) Responsible Innovation. London: John Wiley, forthcoming
60. Ellen-Marie Forsberg and Erik Thorstensen 2018, A Report from the Field: Doing RRI from Scratch in an Assisted Living Technology Research and Development Project. In F. Ferri et al., Governance and Sustainability of Responsible Research and Innovation Processes, Springer Briefs in Research and Innovation Governance, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73105-6_3
61. Jeppesen, L.B., 2004, Profiting from innovative user communities: How firms organize the production of user modifications in the computer games industry. IVS/CBS Working Papers 2004-03, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy, Copenhagen Business School. Available here: https://ideas.repec.org/p/ivs/iivswp/04-03.html.
62. Scarbrough, H. et al., 2015, Developing a Relational View of the Organizing Role of Objects: A study of the innovation process in computer games, Organization Studies, 36:197-220. Available open access here: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0170840614557213.
63. Vesa, M. et al., 2017, Computer games and organization studies, Organization Studies, 38:273-284.
64. Andersen, A. D., M?kitie, T., Steen, M., Hanson, J., Thune, T., & Soppe, B. (2019). The role of inter-sectoral dynamics in sustainability transitions: A comment on the transitions research agenda. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.
65. Turnheim, B., & Sovacool, B. K. (2019). Forever stuck in old ways? Pluralising incumbencies in sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.10.012
66. M?kitie, T., Andersen, A. D., Hanson, J., Normann, H. E., & Thune, T. M. (2018). Established sectors expediting clean technology industries? The Norwegian oil and gas sector's influence on offshore wind power. Journal of Cleaner Production, 177, 813-823.
67. Johnstone, P., Hielscher, S., 2017. Phasing out coal, sustaining coal communities? Living with technological decline in sustainability pathways. Extr. Ind. Soc. 4 (3), 457¨C461.
68. Jewell, J, Cherp, A. On the political feasibility of climate change mitigation pathways: Is it too late to keep warming below 1.5¡ãC? WIREs Clim Change. 2020; 11:e621. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.621
69. Rotmans, J., Kemp, R., & van Asselt, M. (2001). More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy. Foresight, 3(1), 15-31. doi:doi:10.1108/14636680110803003
70. Thune, Taran Mari & Mina, Andrea (2016). Hospitals as innovators in the health-care system: A literature review and research agenda. Research Policy.  ISSN 0048-7333.  45(8), s 1545- 1557.