Pensum for modul 1: Introduksjonsmodul
Sismondo, Sergio 2010. An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies. Wiley-Blackwell (kap. 1-6; 9-10)
Tidd & Bessant 2019. Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, 5th Edition. (kap. 1-2; 5-6; 9)
Nelson, R. & Winter, S. 1982, An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press. (kap. 1) (digitalt tilgjengelig - se Google Scholar)
Daston, Lorrain and Galison, 2007. “Mechanical Objectivity”, i Daston, Lorrain and Galison, Objectivity. Zone Books. S. 115-191.
Edquist, Charles 2005. “Systems of Innovation: Perspectives and Challenges”, i Fagerberg, Jan, Movery, David C. og Richard R. Nelson (red.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, s. 181-208
Hughes T., (1987), "The Evolution of Technological Systems", in Bijker et al. (eds.) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, pp. 51 – 82.
Powell, Walter W. og Stine Grodal 2005. “Networks of Innovators”, i Fagerberg, Jan, Movery, David C. og Richard R. Nelson (red.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, s. 56-85
Bijker, W. 2010. How is technology made? That is the question. Cambridge Journal of Economics 2010, 34, 63–76
Fagerberg, Jan (2003): 'Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: an appraisal of the literature', Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13 (2),pp 125-59.
Freeman, Christopher (1995): 'The 'National System of Innovation' in historical perspective', Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19 (1), pp 5-24
Kuhn, T.S. (1977) “The Historical Structure of Scientific Discovery”, pp. 165-177, in Kuhn, T.S. The Essential Tension. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
Merton, R. 1968. The Matthew Effect in Science, Science, Vol. 159, No. 3810 (Jan. 5, 1968), pp. 56-63
Fagerberg, Jan et al. (eds.) (2005): Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press.
Lundvall, B.-?., Johnson, B., Andersen, E. S., & Dalum, B. (2002). National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Research Policy, 31(2), 213-31.
Pensum for modul 2: Science & Technology Studies (STS)
Asdal, Kristin 2011. Politikkens natur - naturens politikk. Universitetsforlaget. 304 sider.
Asdal, Brenna og Moser 2007. Technoscience. Oslo: Unipub 350 sider - ?pen tilgang
Callon, Michel, Pierre Lascoumes & Yannick Barthe 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. 300 sider.
Shapin, Steven & Simon Schaffer (1985): Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Kompendium (kj?pes i Kopiutsalget hos Akademika)
Akrich, Madeleine 1992. "The De-Scription of Technical Objects" i Bijker, Wiebe E. og John Law, Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, s. 205-224.
Dewey, J. (1927) The Public and Its Problems. An Essay in Political Inquiry. Ohio University Press, chap.1; pp: 3-36.
Edwards, P. 2010. A Vast Machine. Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, chap. 1-2. Pp: 1-49.
Edwards P and Schneider, H. Self-Governance and Peer Reviewing in Science-for-Policy: The Case of the IPCC Second Assessment Report. In Miller, C and Edwards P N (Eds). Changing the Atmosphere. Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance. Cambridge Mass: MIT, pp. 219-247
Haraway, Donna 1991. “Situated Knowledge: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective” in D. Haraway, Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, New York: Routledge, s. 183-201
Hilgartner, Stephen 2000. ?Staging authoritative reports? i Science on Stage: Expert Advice as Public Drama. Stanford University Press, s. 42-70.
Lampland, Martha and Leigh Star Susan (2009): “Reckoning with standards” in M. Lampland and Leigh Star S, Standards and Their Stories. How Quantifying, Classifying, and Formalizing Practices Shape Everyday Life, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, pp.3-24
Latour, Bruno 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Engineers and Scientists through Society. “Chapter 2” (s. 63-100) og “Chapter 3”, (s. 103-144).
Latour, B. (1984) The Pasteurization of France. Harvard University Press. Part 1, Chapter 1 “Strong Microbes and Week Hygienists” pp. 13-59
Latour, B. 2004. “How to bring the collective together”, in Latour, B. Politics of Nature. How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. pp. 53-87
Latour, Bruno & Steve Woolgar 1986 [1979]. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. “Chapter 2” (s. 43-90)
Mol, Annemarie 2002. The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Duke University Press. “Chapter 1” (s. 1-27) og “Chapter 2” (s. 29-51)
Moser, Ingunn & Thygesen, Hilde 2013. “Velferdsteknologi og teleomsorg: Nye idealer of former for omsorg”, i Tjora, Aksel og Line Melby (red.) Samhandling for helse. Gyldendal Akademisk, s. 144-158.
Oudshoorn, Nelly og Trevor Pinch 2003. “Introduction”, i Oudshoorn, Nelly & Trevor Pinch (red.) How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, s. 1-25.
Wyatt, Sally 2003: ?Non-Users also Matter: The Construction of Users and Non-Users of the Internet”, i Oudshoorn, Nelly and Trevor Pinch, How Users Matter: The Co-construction of Users and Technology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, s. 67-79.
Digital tilgang (artikler)
Asdal, K (2008) Enacting Things through Numbers: Taking Nature into Account/ing. Geoforum 39 (1):123-132.
Callon M. Lascoumes, P. Barthe Y (2009) Acting in an Uncertain World. An Essay in Technical Democracy. MIT Press. Chapter 1.
De Laet, M., & Mol, A. (2000). The Zimbabwe Bush Pump: Mechanics of a Fluid Technology. Social Studies of Science, 30(2), 225–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631200030002002
Delgado, A. (2013) “DIYbio: Making Things and Making Futures . Special Issue on Synthetic Biology. Futures, the Journal of Policy, Planning and Future Studies 48: 65-73
Druglitr?, Tone 2012. ? skape en standard for velferd: Fors?ksdyr i norsk biovitenskap, 1953-1986. ?Kap. 1: Introduksjon? (s.11-22), ?Kap. 2: Teoretiske ressurser, metoder og materiale? (s. 23-47), og ?Kap. 6: Kyndig stell? (s. 141-167). PhD-avhandling, TIK Senter for Teknologi, Innovasjon og Kultur, Universitetet i Oslo - ?pen tilgang
Epstein, S (1995) The Construction of Lay Expertise: AIDS Activism and the Forging of Credibility in the Reform of Clinical Trials. Science, Technology, & Human Values (20):4 408-437
Felt, Ulrike og Maximilian Fochler, 2013. “What science stories do: Rethinking the multiple consequences of intensified science communication” i Baranger, Patrick & Bernard Schiele (red) Science Communication Today. International perspectives, Issues and Strategies. Paris: CNRS Editions, s. 75-90.
Hermansen, Erlend A. T. 2015. "I Will Write a Letter and Change the World: The Knowledge Base Kick-Starting Norway’s Rainforest Initiative", i Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies 3 (2): 34-46.
Jensen, Casper Bruun 2005: “Citizen projects and consensus building at the Danish Board of Technology: on experiments in democracy”, i Acta Sociologica 48, s. 221-235.
John Law and Vicky Singleton. 2013. "ANT and Politics: Working in and on the World". Qualitative Sociology Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 485–502.
Kuhn, T.S. 1977. “The Historical Structure of Scientific Discovery”, pp. 165-177, in Kuhn, T.S. The Essential Tension. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lezaun, J., & Soneryd, L. (2007). Consulting citizens: technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics. Public Understanding of Science, 16(3), 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662507079371
Moser, Ingunn og Thygesen, Hilde 2014. “Prosjekteriets dilemma: Mellom avgrenset prosjekt og muligheter for l?ring i teleomsorg og velferdsinnovasjon”, i Tidsskrift for forskning i sygdom og samfund, 21, s. 57-75.
Murphy, M (2004) Immodest Witnessing: The Epistemology of Vaginal Self-Examination in the U.S. Feminist Self-Help Movement. Feminist Studies 30(1):115-147.
Pinch, Trevor and Wiebe E. Bijker 1984. “The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other”, i Social Studies of Science 14 (3), s. 399-441.
Pols, Jeanette 2010. “The heart of the matter. About good nursing and telecare”, i Health Care Analysis18 (4): 374-388.
Ruppert, Evelyn, John Law, Mike Savage 2013. "Reassembling the Social Science Methods: The Challenge of Digital Devices" in Theory, Culture & Society, 30 (4)pp. 22-46
Winner, Langdon 1980. Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus 109 (1) s. 121-136.
Wyatt, S. (2008): "Technological determinism is dead. Long live technological determinism", i The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3. utgave. MIT press, s. 165-180.
Wynne, Brian 1992. "Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science", i Public Understanding of Science 1(3), s. 281-304.
Wynne, Brian 2010. “Strange Weather, Again. Climate Science as Political Art”, i Theory, Culture & Society 27 (no. 2-3): 289-305.
Anbefalt tilleggslitteratur
Foucault, Michel. 2002. "Regjering" i Forelesninger om regjering og styringskunst. Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk, s. 39-71.
Jasanoff, Sheila 2004. States of Knowledge: The coproduction of science and the social order. Routledge.
Jasanoff, Sheila et al 1995. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Seven Oaks: Sage.
Latour, Bruno 2004. “Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern”, i Critical Inquiry 30, s. 225-248. Law, John 2007: ANT and material-semiotics
Marres, Noortje 2012. Material Participation. Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 206 sider.
Pols, Jeannette 2012. “Chapter 8: Innovating care innovation?, in Care at a Distance. On the closeness technology - open access
Sismondo, Sergio 2010. An introduction to Science and Technology Studies. Blackwell Publishing.
Skj?lsvold, Tomas Moe 2015. Vitenskap, teknologi og samfunn. En introduksjon til STS. Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
Online materials:
Turkle: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zL_C0dUxQE4
https://archive.org/details/GoogleAndTheWorldBrain_201611
Pensum for modul 3: Innovasjonsstudier
Nelson, R. & Winter, S. 1982, An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press. (kap. 1-5) (digitalt tilgjengelig - se Google Scholar).
OECD 2005. Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd Edition.
Yin, R. K. 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Chapter 1.
Asheim & Gertler, M. (2005): “The Geography of Innovation: Regional Innovation Systems”. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, ed. J. Fagerberg; D.C. Mowery; and R.R. Neldon, 181-208: Oxford University Press.
Edquist, C. 2005. Systems of Innovation: Perspectives and Challenges. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, ed. J. Fagerberg; D.C. Mowery; and R.R. Neldon, 181-208: Oxford University Press.
Smith, K. (2005): “Measuring innovation”. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, ed. J. Fagerberg; D.C. Mowery; and R.R. Neldon: Oxford University Press.
Abernathy W. J. & Clark, K.B. Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction, Research Policy 14: 3-22.
Castellacci, F., Grodal, S., Mendonca, S. & Wibe, M. 2005. Advances and Challenges in Innovation Studies. Journal of Economic Issues 39: 91-121.
Castellacci, F. 2007. Evolutionary and new growth theories: Are they converging? Journal of Economic Surveys 21: 585-627.
Chesbrough, H. W. 2011. The Era of Open Innovation, MIT Sloan Management Review Winter 2011: 35-41.
Cohen, M.D. and D.A. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35:128-152.
David, P.A. 1985. Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review 75:332-337.
Edler, J. & Fagerberg, J. 2017 Innovation policy: what, why, and how, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Volume 33, Number 1, pp. 2-23
Eisenhardt, K. M.1989. Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review 14(4): 532-550.
Fagerberg, J.; D. Mowery; and B. Verspagen. 2008. Innovation-systems, path dependency and policy: The co-evolution of science, technology and innovation policy and industrial structure in a small, resource-based economy. In Paper presented in the Prime-Latin America Conference in Mexico City, September 24-26.
Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Verspagen, B. (2009). The evolution of Norway's national innovation system. Science and Public Policy, 36(6), 431-44.
Geels, F.W. 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy 31:1257-1274.
Geels, F.W. & Schot, J. 2007 Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways, Research Policy, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp. 399-417
Hartley, J. 2005. Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present. Public Money and Management 25:27-34.
Jensen, M.B.; B. Johnson; E. Lorenz; and B.?. Lundvall. 2007. Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy 36:680-693.
Kline, S.J. and N. Rosenberg. 1986. An overview of innovation. In The Positive Sum Strategy - Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, ed. R. Landau and N. Rosenberg. Washington: National Academy Press.
March, J.G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2:71-87.
Martin, B.R. 2015. Twenty Challenges for Innovation Studies. SPRU Working Paper Series SWPS 2015-30 (November), SPRU Science Policy Research Unit / University of Sussex.
Mazzucato, M. 2018. Mission-oriented innovation policies: challenges and opportunities. Industrial and Corporate Change 5:803-815.
Nelson, R.R. 2011. The Moon and the Ghetto revisited. Science and Public Policy 38:681-690.
OECD. 2017. OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy: Norway 2017. In OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy. OECD Publishing, Paris.
Powell, W.W.; K.W. Koput; and L. Smith-Doerr. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly:116-145.
Schot, J. and W.E. Steinmueller. 2018. Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy 47:1554-1567.
Tripsas, M., & Gavetti, G. 2000. Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal 21: 1147-1161.
Tushman, M.L. and C.A. O'Reilly. 1996. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review 38.
Van de Ven, Andrew H. (2017) The innovation journey: you can't control it, but you can learn to maneuver it, Innovation, 19:1, 39-42
Tidd & Bessant 2019. Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, 5th Edition
Helkkula, Anu, et al 2018. Archetypes of Service Innovation: Implications for Value Cocreation, Journal of Service Research, Vol 21, Issue 3 (Digital tilgang)
Witell, Lars, et al 2016. Defining service innovation: A review and synthesis, Journal of Business Research, Volume 69, Issue 8, August 2016, Pages 2863-2872 (Digital tilgang)