For masteremnene blir det arrangert et felles bibliotekskurs. P? kurset vil du l?re om s?k i nasjonale og internasjonale databaser, og det blir anledning til ? s?ke opp pensumartiklene for emnet. Kurset er frivillig, men vi oppfordrer sterkt studentene til ? delta. Mer informasjon kommer.
B?ker
Birkland, T.A. (3.ed. 2011). An Introduction to the Policy Process. Theories, Concepts, and Models of Public Policy Making. N. Y.: M.E.Sharpe.(146s.)
Hill, M. and Hupe, P. (2009). Implementing Public Policy. Kap. 3-6. London: Sage. 2nd ed. (90 s.)
Hood, C. and H.Z. Margetts (2007). The Tools of government in the digital age. Houndmill: Palgrave Macmillan Kap. 2-5 (105 s.)
Tilgjengelig i kompendium som kj?pes hos Kopiutsalget, Akademika.
Kompendiet er tilbake i salg
Bovens, M., P. ’T Hart og S. Kuipers (2006). ”The politics of policy evaluation”, i M. Moran, M. Rein og R.E. Goodin, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University press. (16s.)
Dahler Larsen, P. (2005). “Evaluation and public management”, i E. Ferlie, L. Lynn og C. Pollitt (red.) The Oxford handbook of public management. Oxford: OUP. (24s.)
Feldman, Martha S. (1989). Order without design: Information production and policy making. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Kap. 1, 2, 12. (42 s.)
Pollitt, C. (2008). Time, policy, management: Governing with the past. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kap. 2: “Timeships – navigating the past” (45 s.)
Schneider, A.L., H. Ingram and P. deLeon (2014). Democratic policy design: Social construction of target populations. In Sabatier, Paul og Christopher Weible. C. (eds.) (2014) Theories of the Policy Process. 3rd ed. Boulder: Westview Press. Ch. 4 (46 s.)
Jenkins-Smith, H.C., D. Nohrstedt, C.M. Weible and P.A. Sabatier (2014). The advocacy coalition framework: Foundations, evolution and ongoing research. In Sabatier, Paul og Christopher Weible. C. (eds.) (2014) Theories of the Policy Process. 3rd ed. Boulder: Westview Press. Ch. 6 (32 s.)
Zahariadas, N. (2014). Ambiguity and multiple streams. In Sabatier, Paul og Christopher Weible. C. (eds.) (2014) Theories of the Policy Process. 3rd ed. Boulder: Westview Press. Ch. 2 (34 s.)
Nedlastbare tidsskrifter, b?ker og andre nedlastbare artikler
Tidsskriftartikler som has i abonnement ved Universitetsbiblioteket er tilgjengelige gjennom Universitetsbibliotekets database for tidsskrifter. Du m? da ha tilgang til og v?re logget p? UiO-systemet. Gratisressurser er tilgjengelige over Internett. Det er ulike m?ter ? s?ke opp en artikkel p?. S?k p? tittel, tidsskrift eller forfatter. Dersom du har problemer med ? finne den s?kbare litteraturen kan du henvende deg til biblioteket.
Dolowitz, D.P. and Marsh, D. (2000). “Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making”. Governance, Vol. 13, No. 1, 5-21. (16s.)
Hall, P.A. and Taylor, R.C.R. (1996). "Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms”. Political Studies, XLIV, 936-957.(20 s.)
Hult, K.M. (1989). “Organizational Design as Public Policy”. Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 17, No.3, 469-488. (19s.)
Rochefort, D.A. and Cobb, R.W. (1993). “Problem Definition, Agenda Access, and Policy Choice”, Policy Studies Journal, Vol.21, No.1, 56-69. (13s.)
Rose, R. (1991). "What is Lesson-Drawing?" i Journal of Public Policy, vol. 11, no.1, 3-28. (25s.)
Weiss, Carol H. (1989): “Congressional committees as users of analysis”, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 8(3): 411–431. (20 s.)
Weiss, Carol H. (1999): “The interface between evaluation and public policy”, Evaluation 5(4): 468-486. (18 s.)
Pensum totalt: ca. 711 sider
Anbefalt litteratur
Denne litteraturen er ikke del av emnets pensum. Anbefalt litteratur er ment ? gi deg en dypere og bredere forst?else for de temaene som dekkes av pensum, eller sette de temaene som tas opp i pensumlitteraturen inn i en bredere sammenheng.
Askim, Jostein; D?ving, Erik & Johnsen, ?ge (2013). Evalueringspraksis i den norske statsforvaltningen 2005-2011, I: Anne Halvorsen; Einar Lier Madsen & Nina Jentoft (red.), Evaluering. Tradisjoner, praksis, mangfold.. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget. Kapittel 5. s 72 – 88 (14 s)
Elmore Richard F. (1979) "Backward Mapping: Implementation Research and Policy Decisions". Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 94, No. 4, ss. 601-616. (15s.)
Eriksen, E.O. og Weig?rd, J, (1997). Conceptualizing Politics: Strategic or Communicative Action?, I Scandinavian Political Studies, Vol.20, No. 3, pp.219-241. (20s.)
Fornyings- administrasjons- og kirkedepartementet (2007). Utredningsinstruksen. (16s.)
Finansdepartementet (2005). Veileder til gjennomf?ring av evalueringer. (26s.)
Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing Public Policy. Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kap. 3. (21s.)
Fischer, F. and Forester, J. (eds.) (1993). The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. London: Duke University Press.
Fornyings- administrasjons- og kirkedepartementet (2007). Veileder i utredningsarbeid. (50s.)
Gustavsson, S. (1980). Types of Policy and Types of Politics, i Scandinavian Political Studies, no.2, 123-141. 18s.
Hill, M. & Hupe, P. (2003).”The multi-layer problem in implementation research”, Public Management Review, 5(4): 471-490. (22s.)
Jordan, A.G. and Schubert, K. (1992). ”A Preliminary Ordering of Policy Network Labels”. European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 21, Nos. 1-2, 7-27. 21s.
Lindblom, C. (1959). “The Science of "Muddling Through"”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 19, No. 2. (Spring, 1959), pp. 79-88. 9s
Linder, S.H. and Peters, B.G. (1989). ‘Instruments of Government: Perceptions and Contexts’, in Journal of Public Policy, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp.35-56. 21s.
Lowi, T. (1972). “Four systems of policy, politics and choice”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 32, 298-310. (12s.)
Rittel, H.W.J. and Melvin, M.M. (1973). “Dilemmas in the General Theory of Planning”. Policy Sciences. Vol. 4, No. 2, 155-169. (19 s.)
Rochefort, D.A. and Cobb, R.W. (1994). The Politics of Problem Definition. Shaping the Policy Agenda. Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
Sabatier, Paul A. (1986). Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Implementation Research: a Critical Analysis and Suggested Synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6, pp 21-48.27s