1. Discourses of economic geography
1.1 Overview
*Scott, A. J., (2000): "Economic geography: the great half-century". In: Clark, G. et al (ed): The Oxford Handbook in Economic geography. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 18-44.
@Neffke, F., et al. (2011). "How do regions diversity over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions." Economic Geography 87(3): 237-265. 28 pages.
@Schot, J. and L. Kanger (2018). "Deep transitions: Emergence, acceleration, stabilization and directionality." Research Policy 47(6): 1045-1059. 14 pages.
1.2 Evolutionary economic geography
*Boschma, R. & Martin, R. 2010. The aims and scope of evolutionary economic geography. Boschma, R. & Martin, R. (eds.) The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, 3?43. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. 40 sider
@ Boschma, R and Frenken, K. (2006) "Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography." Journal of Economic Geography, 6, 273-302.
*Essletzbitchler, J. & Rigby, D.L. 2010. Generalized Darwinism and evolutionary economic geography. Boschma, R. & Martin, R. (eds.) The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, 43–62. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 19 sider
*Frenken, K., Oort van, F., Verburg, T. (2007): Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth. Regional Studies 41, pp. 685-697.
*MacKinnon, D., Cumbers, A., Pike, A., Birch, K. and McMaster, R. (2009): Evolution in Economic Geography: Institutions, Political Economy, and Adaptation. Economic Geography, 85, pp. 129-150.
@ Martin, R. and Sunley, P. (2007): Complexity thinking and evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 7, 573-601. Available online
*Wicken, O. 2009. The Layers of National Innovation Systems: The Historical Evolution of a National Innovation System in Norway. Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D.C. & Verspagen, B. (eds.) Innovation, Path Dependency and Policy. The Norwegian Case, 33–60. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
2. Institutions and regions
@North, D. C., (1991): “Institutions.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5, (1), pp 97–112. 15s.
@ Hodgson, G. M., (2006): “What are Institutions?” Journal of Economic Issues XL (1) pp 1-23. 23s. Available online
*David, P. A., (2007): “Path Dependence, its critics and the quest for “historical economics.” In: The Evolution of Economic Institutions. Edward Elgar. Cheltenham, pp. 120–144. 24s.
@Gertler, M. 2010. Rules of the Game: The Place of Institutions in Regional Economic Change’, Regional Studies 44, 1–15. Available online
@Martin, R. and Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6, 395-437. Available online
@Martin, R. 2012. (Re)Placing Path Dependence: A Response to the Debate. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 36, 179-192.
@Martin, R. 2010. Roepke Lecture in Economic Geography—Rethinking Regional Path Dependence: Beyond Lock-in to Evolution. Economic Geography 86, 1?27.
@Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). "Do Institutions Matter for Regional Development?" Regional Studies 47(7): 1034-1047. 13 pages.
3. The greening of economic geography?
@Bridge, G. (2009). Material Worlds: Natural Resources, Resource Geography and the Material Economy. Geography Compass, 3/3, 1217-1244.
@Bailey I, Caprotti F, 2014, "The green economy: functional domains and theoretical directions of enquiry" Environment and Planning A 46(8) 1797 –1813.16 sider. Available online.
@Gibson, C. and Warren, A. (2016). Resource-Sensitive Global Production Networks: Reconfigured Geographies of Timber and Acoustic Guitar Manufacturing. Economic Geography, 92, 4, 430-454.
*Spaargaren, G., Mol, A.P.J. and Buttel, F.H. (2006). Introduction: Governing Environmental Flows in Global Modernity. In Gert Spaargaren, Arthur P. J. Mol, and Hans Bruyninckx (eds.): Governing environmental flows: global challenges to social theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge-Mass. 37 sider.
4. Sustainability transitions
@Schot, J. and W. E. Steinmueller (2018). "Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change." Research Policy 47(9): 1554-1567.13 pages.
@Steen, M. and G. H. Hansen (2018). "Barriers to Path Creation: The Case of Offshore Wind Power in Norway." Economic Geography 94(2): 188-210. 22 pages.
@Affolderbach, J. (2011). Environmental Bargains: Power Struggles and Decision Making over British Columbia's and Tasmania's Old-Growth Forests. Economic Geography, vol. 87, 181-206. 25 sider Available online
@Aylett A, (2013) Networked urban climate governance: neighborhood-scale residential solar energy systems and the example of Solarize Portland. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 31(5) 858 – 875. 17 sider. Available online
@Carvalho, L., Mingardo, G. and Van Haaren, J. (2012). Green urban transport policies and cleantech innovations: Evidence from Curitiba, G?teborg and Hamburg. European Planning Studies, vol. 20, 375-396. 21 sider. Available online
@Coenen, L., Benneworth, P. and Truffer, B. (2012). Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 41, 968-979. 11s. Available online
@De Laurentis, C. (2013). Innovation and Policy for Bioenergy in the UK: A Co-Evolutionary Perspective. Regional Studies, DOI:10.1080/00343404.2013.834320. 15 sider. Available online
@Dewald, U. and Truffer, B. (2012).The Local Sources of Market Formation: Explaining Regional Growth Differentials in German Photovoltaic Markets. European Planning Studies, vol. 20, 397-420. 23sider. Available online
@Gibbs, D og O’Neill, K. (2014). Rethinking sociotechnical transitions and green entrepreneurship: the potential for transformative change in the green building sector. Environment and Planning A 46(5) 1088 – 1107. 20s. Available online
@Haarstad, H. and Rusten, G. (2016). The challenges of greening energy: policy/industry dissonance at the Mongstad refinery, Norway. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34, 340-355. Available online.
@Hvarregaard, M. T., Kjeldsen, C. and Noe, E. (2016). It's never too late to join the revolution! - Enabling new modes of production in the contemporary danish food system. European Planning Studies. Availbel online
@J?rgensen, U. (2012). Mapping and navigating transitions—The multi-level perspective compared with arenas of development. Research Policy, 41, 996-1010. 15s. Available online
@Karn?e, P. and Garud, R. (2012). Path Creation: Co-creation of Heterogeneous Resources in the emergence of the Danish Wind Turbine Cluster. European Planning Studies, vol. 20, 733-752. 20s. Available online
@Kvam, G.T., Bj?rkhaug, H. and Pedersen, A.C. (2017). How relationships can influence an organic firm's network identity. European Planning Studies. Available online.
@Lovio, R. and Kivimaa, P. (2012). Comparing alternative Path Creation Frameworks in the context of Emerging Biofuel Fields in the Netherlands, Sweden and Finland. European Planning Studies, vol. 20, 773-790. 17s. Available online
@Prudham, S. (2009). Pimping climate change: Richard Branson, global warming, and the performance of green capitalism. Environment and Planning A 41(7) 1594 – 1613. 20s. Available online
@Simmie, J. (2012). Path Dependence and New Path Creation in Renewable Technologies. European Planning Studies, vol 20, 729-731. Available online
Totalt 718s.