Pensum SYKVIT4224 H?st 2015

Det tas forbehold om endringer

B?ker

  • Polit D.F. og Beck C.T. (2012) Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 9th ed. Philadelphia, Pa.: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  • Thagaard T. (2013) Systematikk og innlevelse: en innf?ring i kvalitativ metode. 4. utg. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.

Artikler

Artikler som belyser vitenskapsteoretiske retninger og andre overordnede metodiske perspektiver

  • Cudmore, H. og Sondemeyer, J. (2007) Through the looking glass: being a critical ethnographic researcher in a familiar nursing context. Nurse Reseaercher, 14, 25-35.
  • Curtis, S., Gesler, W., Smith, G., og Wasjburn, S. (2000) Approaches to sampling and case selection in qualitative research: examples in the geography of health. Social Science and Medicine,50, 1001-1014.(Metodeartikkel om utvalg)
  • Dowling, M. (2004) Hermeneutics: an exploration. Nurse Researcher, 11, 30-39.
  • Earle, V. (2010) Phenomenology as research method or substantive metaphysics? An overview of phenomenologys uses in nursing. Nursing Philosophy, 11, 286-296.
  • Rolfe G. (2006) Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: Quality and the idea of qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53, 304-310.
  • Risjord, M., Dunbar, S.B. og Moloney, M.F. (2002) A new foundation for methodological triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 34, 269-275.
  • Wimpenny, P. og Gass, J. (2000) Interviewing in phenomenology and grounded theory: is there a difference? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31, 1485-1492.

Artikler som viser bruk av ulike metoder for datainnsamling

  • Bj?rk, I.T., T?ien, M. og S?rensen, A.L. (2013) Exploring informal learning among hospital nurses. Journal of Workplace Learning, 25, 426-440. (Observasjon og individuelle intervjuer)
  • Foss, C, og Kirkevold, M. (2008) Unfolding the invisible of the visible: gendered constructions of patient participation. Nursing Inquiry, 15, 299-308. (Visuelle data)
  • Guillemin, M. og Heggen, K. (2009) Rapport and respect: negotiating ethical relations between researcher and participant. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 12, 291-299. (Etikk i intervjusituasjon)
  • Hauge, S. og Heggen, K.M. (2008) The nursing home as a home: a field study of residents’ daily life in the common living rooms. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17, 460-467. (Observasjon)
  • Juritsen, T.I, Engebretsen, E. og Heggen, K.M. (2013) Subject to empowerment: the constitution of power in an educational program for health professionals. Medical Health Care and Philosophy, 16, 443-455. (Dokumentanalyse - diskurs)
  • Kevern, J. og Webb, C. (2001) Focus groups as a tool for critical social research in nurse education. Nurse Education Today, 21, 323-333. (Fokus grupper)
  • Sandelowski, M. (2013) Text-in-context: a method for extracting findings in mixed-methods mixed research synthesis studies. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69, 1428-1437. (Syntese av forskningsartikler)
  • Sandelowski, M. (2000) What ever happened to qualitative description? Researech in Nursing and Health 23(4), 334-340.
  • Sk?r, R. (2009) The meaning of autonomy in nursing practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 19, 2226–2234.(Individuelle intervju og fokusgrupper)
  • W?ien, H. og Bj?rk, I.T. (2013) Intensive care pain treatment and sedation: Nurses’experiences of the conflict between clinical judgement and standardised care: An explorative study. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 29, 128-136. (Fokus grupper)

Litteratur som ogs? blir brukt i kurset

  • Fangen, K. (2010). Deltagende observasjon. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget
  • Kvale, S. og, Brinchman, S. (2009) Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative interviewing. London: Sage.
  • Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods. London: Sage. Kap. 5, s. 230-46
Publisert 30. apr. 2015 09:46 - Sist endret 19. mai 2015 15:24