Note: There is an unfortunate …
Note: There is an unfortunate inaccuracy in Exercise 1(h) (stemming from me first working with a different focus parameter than the one I chose to use in the end). The focus parameter mu is meant to be equal to the upper tail probability Pr(Y \ge y0) throughout Exercise 1, as explained in (b)-(g), i.e. also in point (h). So \mun there is as in the formula of point (e), but with a = delta/rootn, etc. -- Though this is fairly clear from the context and hopefully does not stop anyone from thinking along the right lines, please mention this correction detail to your comrades.
Published June 1, 2011 10:22 PM
- Last modified June 10, 2011 2:10 PM