Comment on Lemma 8.2.
Let v(E)=¡ÒE f(t)dt, E€B. We have seen that v(I)=0 for all open intervals I, hence v(O)=0 for all open sets O (as such O can be written as a countable union of open pairwise disjoint intervals).
Suppose f is real valued (the case of complex f follows easily from this). We let
P= { x € (a,b): f(x)¡Ý 0}, N={x € (a,b) : f(x)<0}.
Then P, N defines a Hahn decomposition for v and
v+(E)=¡ÒE XP f dt, v-(E)= -¡ÒE XN f dt, E € B (XP= the characteritic function of P, etc.) defines the Jordan decomposition of v.
Since Lebesgue measure is regular, there is a decreasing sequence On of open sets containing P with intersection G such that G \ P has Lebesgue measure zero. Now this implies v(G \ P)=0. Since v(G)=limn v(On) =0, it follows that v(P)=0. Similarly v(N)=0. Hence f+= f XP = 0 ae and f- =-f XN = 0 ae. Therefore, f=0 ae as claimed ?