Pensum/l?ringskrav

Richards, Jennifer 2008. Rhetoric. Oxon: Routledge.

Svensson, Trygve C. og Vogt, David C. 2009. ”Konfliktl?sningens retorikk.” Rhetorica Scandinavica 52, 6-32.

Frazel, Thomas D. 2009. The rhetoric of Cicero's In Verrem. G?ttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht. (Utdrag)

Walzer, Arthur E. 2003. “Quintilian’s ‘Vir Bonus’ and the Stoic Wise Man”. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 4, 25-41 (tilgjengelig p? JSTOR)

Zerba, Michelle 2004. ”The Frauds of Humanism: Cicero, Machiavelli, and the Rhetoric of Imposture.” Rhetorica, Vol. XXII, Issue 3, 215-240. (Tilgjengelig p? JSTOR)

Gross, Alan G. 2004. “Why Hermagoras Still Matters: The Fourth Stasis and Interdisciplinarity.” Rhetoric Review, Vol. 23. No. 2, 141-55. (Tilgjengelig p? JSTOR)

IN ENGLISH

Richards, Jennifer 2008. Rhetoric. Oxon: Routledge.

Jamieson, Kathleen Hall 1988. Eloquence in an Electronic Age – The Transformation of Political Speechmaking. New York: Oxford University Press. (excerpts)

Frazel, Thomas D. 2009. The rhetoric of Cicero's In Verrem. G?ttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht. (excerpts) Examples taken from: Cicero, Against Verres.

Walzer, Arthur E. 2003. “Quintilian’s ‘Vir Bonus’ and the Stoic Wise Man”. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 4, 25-41 (download at JSTOR)

Zerba, Michelle 2004. ”The Frauds of Humanism: Cicero, Machiavelli, and the Rhetoric of Imposture.” Rhetorica, Vol. XXII, Issue 3, 215-240 (at JSTOR)

Gross, Alan G. 2004. “Why Hermagoras Still Matters: The Fourth Stasis and Interdisciplinarity.” Rhetoric Review, Vol. 23. No. 2, 141-55. (at JSTOR)

Publisert 4. okt. 2011 15:07 - Sist endret 19. des. 2011 14:06