Overmalinger:
John Dornberg, After the sex change, Vasari Diary, ARTnews 91, No. 4 (1992 Apr.), 17.
Lorne Campell & Jill Dunkerton, A famous Gossaert rediscovered, The Burlington Magazine, Vol. 138, No. 1116 (1996 Mar.), 164-173. (http://www.jstor.org/ via BIBSYS.)
Syreangrep:
B. Burmester, J. Koller & H. Kawinski, The Munich Dürer attack: the removal of sulphuric acid and acid compounds by use of conditioned ion-exchange resin, Cleaning, retouching and coatings, preprints IIC Brussels congress, 3-7 September 1990, London (1990), 177-183.
Bruno Heimberg, The Munich Dürer attack: conservation and restoration of the damaged panels, Cleaning, retouching and coatings, preprints IIC Brussels congress, 3-7 September 1990, London (1990), 184-187.
Forurensing:
Roy Perry, Problems of dirt accumulation and its removal from unvarnished paintings: A practical review, Dirt and pictures separated, UKIC & Tate Gallery conference 1990, London (1990), 3-6.
Peter Brimblecombe, Particulate material in air of art galleries, Dirt and pictures separated, UKIC & Tate Gallery conference 1990, London (1990), 7-10.
Alan Phenix & Aviva Burnstock, The deposition of dirt: a review of the literature, with scanning electron microscope studies of dirt on selected paintings, Dirt and pictures separated, UKIC & Tate Gallery conference 1990, London (1990), 11-18.
Nicholas Eastaugh, The visual effects of dirt on paintings, Dirt and pictures separated, UKIC & Tate Gallery conference 1990, London (1990), 19-23.
Peter Booth, Protecting paintings from dirt, Dirt and pictures separated, UKIC & Tate Gallery conference 1990, London (1990), 24-26.
Barry C. Leveton, Framing method used to protect vulnerable works, Dirt and pictures separated, UKIC & Tate Gallery conference 1990, London (1990), 27-28.
Timothy Green, Surface dirt removal from unvarnished paint films, Dirt and pictures separated, UKIC & Tate Gallery conference 1990, London (1990), 51-55.
Paula M. S. Rom?o, Adília M. Alarc?o & César A. N. Viana, Human saliva as a cleaning agent for dirty surfaces, Studies in Conservation 35 (1990), 153-155.
Jonathan Ashley-Smith (ed.), Cleaning, Science for conservators, Vol. 2, London (1996), 13-22.
“Blanching”:
Pierre B. Boissonas, A treatment for blanching in paintings, Studies in Conservation 22, No. 1 (1977), 43-44.
Martin Wyld, John Mills & Joyce Plesters, Some observations on blanching, National Gallery Technical Bulletin, Vol. 4, London (1980), 49-63.
J. Koller & A. Burmester, Blanching of unvarnished modern paintings: a case study on a painting by Serge Poliakoff, Cleaning, retouching and coatings, preprints IIC Brussels congress, 3-7 September 1990, London (1990), 138-143.
Aviva Burnstock, Melanie Caldwell & Marianne Odlyha, A technical examination of surface deterioration of Stanley Spencer’s paintings at Sandham memorial chapel, ICOM-CC 10th Triennial Meeting Washington, DC, USA, 22-27 September 1993, Paris (1993), 231-238.
Karin Groen, Scanning electron-microscopy as an aid in the study of blanching, The Hamilton Kerr Institute, Bulletin No. I, Cambridge (1998), 48-65.
For de som har sett p? NRK2 p? l?rdagskvelder:
Joyce Townsend & Jackie Heuman, Edgar Degas: Die kleine T?nzerin, 14 Jahre alt: Untersuchungen zur Farbschicht, Restauro: Zeitschrift für Kunsttechniken, Restaurierung und Museumsfragen 100, No. 2 (1994), 100-103.
Michael Duffy, Les demoiselles d’Avignon: Core of Picasso’s laboratory, Modern art, new museums, preprints IIC Bilbao congress, 13-17 September 2004, London (2004), 133-136.
Solvents and Solubility
Torraca, G., Solubility and solvents for Conservation Problems, ICCROM third edition (1984). A great review or introduction to the groups of solvents used in conservation, the functional groups that distinguish them and the effect those groups have on the intermolecular forces that in turn establish their solubility parameters.
Hedley, G., “Solubility Parameters and varnish removal: a survey”, in Gerry Hedley Measured Opinions, edited C. Villlers, United Kingdom Institute for Conservation, London (1993) pp.128-134. A really good review of solubility parameters.
Phenix, A., "Solubility parameters and the cleaning of paintings: an update and review", Zeitschrift für Kunsttechnologie und Konservierung, Vol. 12, Part II (1998) pp.387-409. A very thorough critic of what has become before including Teas and Headley with many new suggestions of other parameters that might serve a conservator. Many of these systems are challenged but Phenix is aware of the plight of the conservator in these matters and is probably the author to watch fore more updates.
Stravroudis, C. and Blank, S., “Solvents & Sensibility”, WAAC Newsletter, Vol. 11, No. 2 (May 1989) pp.2-10. (Full text can be found on the WAAC website) A humorous look at solubility parameters that suggests that we can ignore them. While the message may have some validity it helps to have read the previous two articles in order to fully understand what the authors mean. They also introduce Wolbers’ research as a revolution at a time when the critical research had yet to weigh in fully.
New Cleaning Methods
Wolbers, R. C., with Sterman, N.T. and Stravroudis, C. Notes for Workshop on New Methods in the Cleaning of Paintings, The Getty Conservation Institute, Marina del Rey, CA (August 1990) Focus on the sections concerning cleaning materials which in the above text is section IV.
The Effects of Solvents and Cleaning Agents
Michaliski, S., “A physical model of the cleaning of oil paint” in Cleaning Retouching and Coatings, IIC, London (1990) pp.85-92. A review of the literature up to 1990. It touches upon leaching and swelling of oil paint and has a good list of bibliography.
Phenix, A. and Sutherland, K. “The cleaning of paintings: effects of organic solvents on oil paint films”, Reviews in Conservation 2 (2001) A good review on the effects of solvents on oil paints. Once you read this you can pick one or two articles cited in this text or in the following bibliography to get a feel for the type of writing published on this topic. The list of citations in this article will be more complete than my own bibliography.
Khandekar, N. “A survey of the conservation literature relating to the development of aqueous gel cleaning on painted and varnished surface”, Reviews in Conservation 1 (2000) pp. 10-20. A great review on the research done on the effects of solvents gels on oil paint. Like the above citation, you can use this article to choose a few of the research articles to get a feel of the literature and use the citations as a more complete bibliography on the subject than my own.
Philosophical Issues on Cleaning and History
Hedley, G., “On humanism, aesthetics and the cleaning of paintings”, in Gerry Hedley Measured Opinions, edited C. Villlers United Kingdom Institute for Conservation, London (1993) pp.152-166. This is an incredibly well presented discussion of partial, selective and total cleaning.
Ruhemann, H., The Cleaning of Paintings Problems and Potentialities, Frederick A. Praeger, New York, Washington (1968). While this book may be shocking at times from our 21st century point of view it is one of the only texts that I know of that addresses cleaning from the point of view of a respected practitioner. His chapters on his background and the techniques and ethics of cleaning paintings are really fascinating from a historical point of view and often still relevant.
Sutherland, K., “Cleaning, controversy and research” introductory chapter in Solvent extractable components of oil paint films, academic dissertation, FOM Institute for Atomic and Molecular Physics, Amsterdam (2001) pp.1-29. The first two chapters of this dissertation are a succinct review of cleaning controversies, the roll of science in conservation and a literature review of studies of solvent action.
Further Bibliography on Cleaning
Background Science Sources for Conservators
Ashley-Smith, J. Scientific Editor, and Wilks, H. Series Editor, Science for Conservators, Vol. 2: An Introduction to Materials, The Conservation Unit of the Museums and Galleries Commission in conjunction with Routledge, London and New York (1987).
Ashley-Smith, J. Scientific Editor, and Wilks, H. Series Editor, Science for Conservators, Vol. 2: Cleaning, The Conservation Unit of the Museums and Galleries Commission in conjunction with Routledge, London and New York (1992).
Mill, J. S. and White, R. The Organic Chemistry of Museum Objects, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (1999).
Solvents and Solubility
Burke, J., “Solubility Parameters: Theory and Application”, The Book and Paper Group Annual, Vol. 3 (1984) pp.13-58.
Feller, R., On Picture Varnishes and Their Solvents, National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC (1985).
Hedley, G., “Solubility Parameters and varnish removal: a survey”, in Gerry Hedley Measured Opinions, edited C. Villlers, United Kingdom Institute for Conservation, London (1993) pp.128-134.
Hedley, G., “Recent Developments in Cleaning”, in Gerry Hedley Measured Opinions, edited C. Villlers, United Kingdom Institute for Conservation, London (1993) pp.135-136.
Phenix, A. “Solubility parameters and the cleaning of painting: an update and review”, Zeitschrift fürKunsttechnologie undKonservierung 12, Part II (1998), pp.387-409.
Stravroudis, C. and Blank, S., “Solvents & Sensibility”, WAAC Newsletter, Vol. 11, No. 2 (May 1989) pp.2-10. (Full text can be found on the WAAC website)
Torraca, G., Solubility and solvents for Conservation Problems, ICCROM third edition (1984).
New Cleaning Methods
Wolbers, R. C., with Sterman, N.T. and Stravroudis, C. Notes for Workshop on New Methods in the Cleaning of Paintings, The Getty Conservation Institute, Marina del Rey, CA (August 1990).
The Effects of Solvents and Cleaning Agents
Burnstock, A., and White, R., “The effects of selected solvents and soaps on simulated canvas painting” in Cleaning Retouching and Coatings, IIC, London (1990) pp.111-118.
Burnstock, A., and Learner, T., “Changes in the surface characteristics of artificially aged mastic varnishes after cleaning using alkaline reagents”, Studies in Conservation 37 (1992) pp.165-184.
Burnstock, A. and Kieslich, T., “A Study of the Clearance of Solvent Gels used for Varnish Removal from Paintings”, in Preprints of the ICOM Committee for Conservation 11th Triennial Meeting, Edinburgh (1996) Vol 1., pp.253-262.
Erhardt, D. and Bischoff, J.J., “The Roles of Various Components of Resin Soaps, Bile Acid Soaps and Gels, and Their Effects on Oil Paint Films”, Studies in Conservation 39 (1994) pp.3-27.
Erhardt, D. and Tsang, J. S., “The extractable components of oil paint films” in Cleaning Retouching and Coatings, IIC, London (1990) pp.93-97.
Hedley, G. Odlyha, M., Burnstock, A., Tillinghast, J., and Husband, C., “A study of the mechanical and surface properties of oil paint films treated with organic solvents and water” in Cleaning Retouching and Coatings, IIC, London (1990) pp.98-105.
Khandekar, N. “A survey of the conservation literature relating to the development of aqueous gel cleaning on painted and varnished surface”, Reviews in Conservation 1 (2000) pp. 10-20.
Khandekar, N., Dorge, V., Manjian, H., Stulik, D., and Tagle, A., “Detection of residues on the surface of objects previously treated with aqueous solvent gels”, in Preprints of the 13th Triennial Meeting of the ICOM Committee for Conservation, Rio de Janeiro (2002) Vol. 1, pp.352-359.
Phenix, A. and Boon, J., “Solvent extraction of organic components from oleo-resinous ‘megilp’ paint media”, in Preprints of the ICOM Committee for Conservation 12th Triennial Meeting, Lyon (1999) Vol. I, pp.318-324.
Koller, J., “Cleaning of a nineteenth-century painting with deoxycholate soap: mechanism and residue studies”, in Cleaning Retouching and Coatings, IIC, London (1990) pp.106-110.
McGlinchey, C. “Thermal effects of fresh and mature oil paint films: The effect of pigments as driers and the solvent leaching of mature paint films”, Material Issues in Art and Archaeology II, Vol. 185, from Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, Pennsylvania (1991) pp.93-104.
Michaliski, S., “A physical model of the cleaning of oil paint” in Cleaning Retouching and Coatings, IIC, London (1990) pp.85-92.
Phenix, A. and Sutherland, K. “The cleaning of paintings: effects of organic solvents on oil paint films”, Reviews in Conservation 2 (2001).
Phenix, A. “The swelling of artists’ paints in organic solvents Part 2: comparative swelling powers of selected organic solvents and solvent mixtures”, Journal of the American Institute for Conservation 41 (2002) pp. 61-90.
Phenix, A. “Building Models: Comparative Swelling Powers of Organic Solvents on Oil Paint and the Cleaning of Paintings”, V. & A. Conservation Journal 40, (Spring 2002) pp. 18-21.
Phenix, A. “Solvent-induced swelling of paint films: some preliminary results”, WAAC Newsletter 20, No. 3 (Sept. 1998).
Stringari, C., “Vincent van Gogh’s triptych of Trees in Blossom, Arles, (1888) Part I Examination and Treatment of the Altered Surface Coatings”, in Cleaning Retouching and Coatings, IIC, London (1990) pp.126-130.
Stolow, N. “The action of solvents on drying oil films, Parts I and II”, Journal of Oil and Colour Chemistry (1957) pp. 377-402 and pp.488-99.
Stolow, N. “Application of Science to Cleaning Methods: solvent action studies on pigmented and unpigmented linseed oil films”, in Recent Advances in Conservation, ed. G. Thompson, Butterworths (1963) pp.84-88.
Sutherland, K., “Solvent-extractable components of linseed oil paint films”, in Studies in Conservation 48, No. 2 (2003) pp.111-135.
Sutherland, K., Solvent extractable components of oil paint films, academic dissertation, FOM Institute for Atomic and Molecular Physics, Amsterdam (2001).
Sutherland, K. and Shibayama, N. “The components of oil paint films extracted by organic solvents”, in Preprints of the ICOM Committee for Conservation 12th Triennial Meeting, Lyon (1999) Vol. I, pp.347-52.
Tsang, J. S., and Erhardt, D., “ Current research on the effects of solvents and gelled and aqueous cleaning systems on oil paint films”, Journal of the American Institute for Conservation 31 (1992) pp.87-94.
Tumosa, C., Milland, J. Erhardt, d. and Mecklenburgh, M. “The effects of solvents on the physical properties of paint films”, in Preprints of the ICOM Committee for Conservation 12th Triennial Meeting, Lyon (1999) Vol. I, pp.341-346.
White, R. and Roy, A. “GC-MS and SEM studies on the effects of solvent cleaning on old master paintings from the National Gallery, London”, Studies in Conservation 43, No. 3 (1980) pp.159-176.
Wolbers, R.C., “A radio-isotopic assay for the direct measurement of residual cleaning materials on a paint film” in Cleaning Retouching and Coatings, IIC, London (1990) pp.119-125.
Philosophical Issues of Cleaning and History
Hedley, G., “Impressions of Change”, in Gerry Hedley Measured Opinions, ed. C. Villlers, United Kingdom Institute for Conservation, London (1993) pp.136-7-144.
Hedley, G., and Villers, C. “Evaluating colour change: intention, interpretation and lighting”, in Gerry Hedley Measured Opinions, ed. C. Villlers, United Kingdom Institute for Conservation, London (1993) pp.145-148.
Hedley, G., “Art, science and ambiguity”, in Gerry Hedley Measured Opinions, ed. C. Villlers, United Kingdom Institute for Conservation, London (1993) pp.149-151.
Hedley, G., “On humanism, aesthetics and the cleaning of paintings”, in Gerry Hedley Measured Opinions, ed. C. Villlers, United Kingdom Institute for Conservation, London (1993) pp.152-166.
Hedley, G., “Cleaning and meaning: The Ravished Image reviewed”, in Gerry Hedley Measured Opinions, ed. C. Villlers, United Kingdom Institute for Conservation, London (1993) pp.167-171.
Hedley, G., “Long lost relations and new found relativities”, in Gerry Hedley Measured Opinions, edited C. Villlers, United Kingdom Institute for Conservation, London (1993) pp.172-178.
Ruhemann, H., The Cleaning of Paintings Problems and Potentialities, Frederick A. Praeger, New York, Washington (1968).
Sutherland, K., “Cleaning, controversy and research” introductory chapter in Solvent extractable components of oil paint films, academic dissertation, FOM Institute for Atomic and Molecular Physics, Amsterdam (2001) pp.1-29.
Pensum til Francoise Hanssen-Baurs forelesning om Etiske aspekter, Moderne tiln?rminger, materialer og metoder.
Helmut Ruhemann "The cleaning of paintings. Problems and potentials" kap. 7, s. 170-240
Paul Ackroyd & David Bomford "Questions of reversibility in the conservation of paintings on canvas" I: Reversibility does it exist? British museum Occasional Papers, nr. 135, ed, by Andrew Oddy and Sara Carroll, s.58-59
David Boford & Mark Leonard (eds) Issues in the conservation of paintings. Readings in conservation. The getty conservation Institute. Los Angelis. 2004 (Les s. 317-325, s. 339-357, s. 407-423)
Alan Phenix "The science and technology of the cleaning of pictures: Past. Present and Future" I: 25 years school of conservation: The jubilee symposium Preprints 18-20 may 1998. Konservatorskolen Det kongeliege Danske Kunstakademi. K?benhavn. 1998. s. 109-119
Valgfritt pensum - se i permen KONS4044
Rens av Munch
Henvisninger til egne artikler brukt under foredrag ved Konserveringsstudiet 27. april 2005
Trond Aslaksby
- “The Conservation of the Edvard Munch Collection – A 50 Years’ Story”Manuskript til foredrag holdt under seminaret “Conservació i Restauració d'Art Contemporani” ved Facultat de Belles Arts, Universitat de Barcelona, 15. – 18. november 1993. – Publisert p? catalansk med atten illustrasjoner av Universitat de Barcelona (1993?).Samme foredrag (oppdatert) gitt ved University of Northumberland, Newcastle i 1998 under tittelen “The Conservation of the Edvard Munch Collection – A Story Spanning more than Fifty Years.”
- “The Weathered Paintings of Edvard Munch: Artistic Intention, Conservation, Display – A Triangle of Conflicts.” Foredrag holdt under symposiet “El Guernica y los problemas éticos y técnicos de la manipulación de obras de arte”, ved Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofia, Madrid, 15. – 16. januar 1998.Publisert i bok med samme tittel i 2002 av Fundación Marcelino Botin, Pedrueca, 1. 39003 Santander/Espa?a. ISBN 84-95516-48-9Teksten gjengitt i Munch-museets jubileumsutstilling ”Munch-museet fyller 40 ?r”, 2003.
Historien om behandlingen av Edvard Munchs Det syke barn (1886) finnes i artikkelen
- “The Sick Child – a closer look” Den dreier seg om observasjoner og refleksjoner omkring konserveringen og manglende bruk av teknisk informasjon i kunsthistorisk forskning.Artikkel publisert i Conservare necesse est, Festskrift til Leif Einar Plahter p? hans 70-?rsdag. NKF-N/IIC Nordic Group, Oslo 1999, ISBN 82-990745-8-4, 130-143.
Andre om Munch:
Biljana Topalova-Casadiego, Edvard Munchs L?srivelse, 1896 – aspekter ved maleteknikken, Norske Konservers, NKF-N 2, 2004, 13-14.
Johannes R?d, “Hestekur”, Aulamalerier og nasjonalgalleriet. Om kunstneren og konservatoren Ole D?rje Haug, Kunst og kultur 80, 1997, 54-66.
Jan Thurmann-Moe, Edvard Munchs “hestekur”: eksperimenter med teknikk og materialer, Munch-museet, Oslo 1995.
Leif Einar Plahter, Munch under overflaten. Beneath the surface of Edvard Munch, Nasjonalgalleriet, Oslo 1994. Se eventuelt Conservare necesse est, Festskrift til Leif Plahters p? hans 70-?rsdag, Oslo 1999, 111-127.
Leif Einar Plahter, Det syke barn. Spekulasjoner og fakta omkring maleriets opprinnelige utseende, Kunst og kultur 75, nr. 2, 1992, 85-99.
Leif Einar Plahter, Det syke barn og v?r. En r?ntgenunders?kelse av to Munch-bilder, Kunst og kultur 57, 1974, 103-115.