Pensum/l?ringskrav

Bruce G. TRIGGER: A History of Archaeological Thought, 1989, eller senere gjenopptrykk/utgaver (ISBN 0-521-33818-2 pbk). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. Denne boken finnes ogs? i norsk oversettelse med tittel: Arkeologiens idehistorie .

Forel?pig pensumlitteratur til kasus-studier (forbehold om endringer):

Teoretiske og metodiske tiln?rminger til teknologi i steinalder (Ingrid Fuglestvedt)

Eriksen, B. Valentin 2000a: Grundl?ggende flintteknologi. I Eriksen, B.Valentin (red.): Flintstudier. En h?ndbog i systematiske analyser af flintinventarer, ?rhus: Aarhus universitetsforlag, ss. 37-50.

Eriksen, B. Valentin 2000b: Cha?ne opératoire – den operative proces ogkunsten at t?nke som en flinthugger. I: Eriksen, B. Valentin (red.):Flintstudier. En h?ndbog i systematiske analyser af flintinventarer, ?rhus: Aarhus universitetsforlag, ss. 75-100.

Arkeologi og struktur (Ingrid Fuglestvedt)

Olsen, Bj?rnar, 1997: Fra ting til tekst. Teoretiske perspektiv i arkeologisk forskning. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, s 132-142, 145-156, 164-171, 194-218

Hastrup, K. 1998: Viljen til viden. En humanistisk grundbog. K?benhavn: Gyldendal, s 153-169

Arkeologisk forspill (Rasmus Brandt)

Raritas et curiositas – samlervirksomhet som grunnlag for moderne arkeologi og museumsvirksomhet (ref. Trigger, kap. 2)

Foucault, M., The order of things. An archaeology of the human sciences (eng. oversett.), New York 1995, kap. 5: “Classifying”, s. 125-165

Kristensen, J.E., “Det kuri?se og det klassifiserende blikk”, i Museum Europa. Om tingenes orden (Den jyske historiker 64, 1993), s. 31-44

Arkeologi fra kulturhistorie til postprosessualisme (Rasmus Brandt)

Den gang Roma ble by – et stykke moderne forskningshistorie om urbanisering og urbaniseringsprosesser

Brandt, J.R. & Rathje, A., Ficana – en milesten p? veien til Roma, K?benhavn 1980, f?lgende kapitler:

 

  • Rathje, A., ”Urbaniseringsprocessen i Latium og Roma til 7. ?rh. f. Kr.”, s. 23-31
  • Bartoloni, G., ”Gravskikke i Latium i jernalderen”, s. 123-128

 

Cornell, T., ”The foundation of Rome in ancient literary tradition”, i H. McK. Blake, T.W. Potter & D.B. Whitehouse, Papers in Italian archaeology I: The Lancaster seminar. Recent research in prehistoric, classical and medieval archaeology. Part I (British Archaeological Reports, Supplementary Series 41(i)), Oxford 1978, 131-140

Meyer, J.C., Pre-Republican Rome. An analysis of the cultural and chronological relations 1000-500 BC (Analecta Romana Instituti Danici, supplementum XI), Odense 1983, s. 9-29

Archaeology and Empire (Neil Price)

 

  • case study: post-colonial archaeology in question
  • link to Trigger on imperialism and racism (ch. 4)

 

Reading list, 40-60 pages:

Anderson, D. 1996. Reburial: is it reasonable? In Vitelli, K. (ed.) Archaeological ethics. Altamira, Walnut Creek: 200-208.

Chippindale, C. 1995. Editorial. Antiquity 69: 435-43.

Forde, C., Brocklebank, L. & Kaufman, M. 1992 The posthumous history of William Lanne. World Archaeological Bulletin 6: 63-75.

Gosden, C. 2001. Postcolonial archaeology: issues of culture, identity and knowledge. In Hodder, I. (ed.) Archaeological theory today. Polity Press, Cambridge: 241-61.

Meighan, C.W. & Zimmerman, L. 1996. Burying American archaeology - Sharing control of the past. In Vitelli, K. (ed.) Archaeological ethics. Altamira, Walnut Creek: 209-221.

Turner, E. 1989. The souls of my dead brothers. In Layton, R. (ed.) Conflict in the archaeology of living traditions. Unwin, London: 189-194.

 

Archaeology and politics (Neil Price)

 

  • case study: totalitarian archaeologies in the twentieth century
  • link to Trigger on Soviet archaeological paradigms (ch. 6)

 

 

Reading list, 40-60 pages:

Müller-Wille, M. 1996. The political misuse of Scandinavian prehistory in the years 1933-1945. In Roesdahl, E. & Meulengracht S?rensen, P. (eds.) The waking of Angantyr: the Scandinavian past in European culture. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus: 156-175.

or

Arnold, B. and Hassmann, H. 1995. Archaeology in Nazi Germany: the legacy of the Faustian bargain. In Kohl, P.L. and Fawcett, C. (eds). Nationalism, politics and the practice of archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 70-81. [Read whichever of these you can get hold of]

Nordenborg Myhre, L. 2001. Arkeologi och nazism - en ockupation av ?mnet. In Raudvere, C., Andrén, A. and Jennbert, K. (eds) Myter om det nordiska - mellan romantik och politik. Lund: Nordic Academic Press, 59-90.

Plus any paper from either

Meskell, L. (ed.) 1998. Archaeology under fire: nationalism, politics and heritage in the eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. Routledge, London.

or

Kohl, P.L. & Fawcett, C. (eds.) 1995. Nationalism, politics and the practice of archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

 

Archaeology and text (Neil Price)

 

  • case study: an Arab traveller, the Viking myth and how we use historical sources
  • link to Trigger on (neo)historicism (ch. 5 & 9)

 

 

Reading list, 40-60 pages:

Bintliff, J. (ed.) 1991. The Annales school and archaeology. Leicester University Press, London. Pages 1-19 only.

Herschend, F. 1997. Historical or textual archaeology: an archaeology of critical re-reading. Current Swedish Archaeology 5: 65-78.

Lund Warmind, M. 1995. Ibn Fadlan in the context of his age. In Crumlin-Pedersen, O. & Munch Thye, B. (eds) The ship as symbol in prehistoric and medieval Scandinavia. National Museum, K?benhavn: 130-5.

Montgomery, J. 2000. Ibn Fadlān and the Rūsiyyah. Journal of Arabic and Islamic Studies 3: 1-25.

Paradigmer og norsk bronsealderforskning (eller Stemmer den anglo-amerikanske forskningshistoriens typologi for Norden?) (Christopher Prescott)

Prescott, C. 1994. Paradigm gained – paradigm lost? 150 years of Norwegian Bronze Age research. NAR 27/2, 87-110. (20s)

Eikrem, K. Bronsealder som sosial konstruksjon. Faghistorisk analyse av norsk bronsealderforskning p? 1900-talet. Kap.6. konstruksjon av norsk bronsealder p? 1900-taler, kap. 7. konstruksjon av det norske p? 1900-taler, kap. 8 Produksjonen av kunnskap om norsk bronsealder, s. 51-72. Masteroppg. Ved IAKH, V05. (20 sider)

NB! Det vil nok v?re nyttig og dannende ? lese noen sentrale (om popul?re og lettleste) bakgrunnstekster ogs?:

Br?gger, A.W. 1925. Det norske folk i oldtiden. Kap. Veideredskap og bronsene, Stenalderns og bronsealderens kultur. 94-134.

Shetelig, H. 1925. Norges Forhistorie, kap. IV Norge under bronsealderen, 73-100

Archaeology and Anthropology The role of Anthropology, Analogy and Experimentation in the development of Archaeological theory - contributions by North American archaeologists. (Sheila Coulson)

Binford, L. 1962 Archaeology as Anthropology. American Antiquity 28:2 pp. 217-225

Tringham, R. 1978 'Experimentation , Ethnoarchaeolgy, and the Leapfrogs in Archaeological Methodology.' In Explorations in Ethnoarchaeology ed. Richard A. Gould, University of Ne Mexico Press, Albuquerque pp. 169-199

Binford, L. 1985 Brand X versus the Recommended Product. American Antiquity 50:3 pp. 580-590

Gould, R. A. 1985 The Empiricist Strikes Back: Reply to Binford. American Antiquity 50:3 pp. 638-644

Publisert 21. apr. 2005 09:10 - Sist endret 15. mars 2016 10:44