Periodic evaluation on KFL4060 Gender Equalities in the Nordic Countries in the period spring 06-autumn 07. Elisabet Rogg.

1. Divergences from the original course (descriptions and comments)

The course was carried out according to the course description.

2. Marks, failures and withdrawals (results and comments)

During the 4 terms this evaluation concerns there has been in all 8 registered students. 6 students have taken their exams and the average mark (5 of 6) has been B. Two students did not show up for the exams.

3. Indications/examples on high quality? Are these cases given any special attention?

Judging from the students’ results as well as student evaluations it seems that the course have found a good balance between lectures and discussions based on the syllabus and the students’ own background. Also the students studying at MA level were highly motivated for the course.

4. Indications/examples on low quality? Are these cases given any special attention?

There are no indications of reduced quality of this course.

5. What has been in focus this term in case of improving the quality of the course?

No comments.

6. Suggestions on improvement for the course?

No comments.

Published Nov. 21, 2025 1:07 PM - Last modified Nov. 21, 2025 1:21 PM