IFP-nytt 27. november

• Kj?rven, Marte Eidsand; Gj?steen, Kristian & W?rstad, Tone Linn (2026). Safe and inclusive or unsafe and discriminatory? European digital identity wallets and the challenges of ¡®sole control¡¯. Computer Law & Security Review. ISSN 2212-473X. 60, s. 106235¨C106235. doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2025.106235.
• Bygrave, Lee Andrew & Schmidt, Rebecca (2025). Regulating Non-High-Risk AI Systems Under the EU¡¯s Artificial Intelligence Act, with Special Focus on the Role of Soft Law. I Raposo, Vera (Red.), The European Artificial Intelligence Act: Promises and Perils? | SpringerLink. Springer Nature. ISSN 9783031984068. s. 181¨C210. Vis sammendrag

  The remit of this chapter is twofold. First, it provides a concise overview of how the EU¡¯s Artificial Intelligence Act regulates non-high-risk AI systems. Second, the chapter elucidates the role that the Act assigns to codes of practice and codes of conduct for governing these systems.

• Hjort, Live Sunniva (2025). Informed Consent to AI-based Decisions in Healthcare: Must Patients Understand the AI¡¯s Output? Oslo Law Review. 11(1), s. 1¨C21. doi: 10.18261/olr.11.1.7. Vis sammendrag

  The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical decision-making challenges patients¡¯ right to informed consent and autonomy; many AI systems lack transparency and explainability, making it difficult to explain AI-based treatment recommendations. This article investigates to what extent patients¡¯ right to fully informed consent requires an understanding of the AI output, underlying decision-making processes and associated risks. Analysing European human rights instruments and patients¡¯ rights in Norway, it examines whether the right to informed consent adequately ensures patient understanding in AI-based healthcare. The article argues that the extent of patient understanding required of AI outputs cannot be derived solely from the right to information, but demands a purpose-based interpretation, determined by the impact on patients¡¯ trust in AI-based recommendations and the protection of bodily integrity and autonomy. Informed consent entails flexibility to include information about the AI output and decision-making processes to ensure patients fully understand the implications of AI-based interventions. Opaque AI precludes this disclosure, undermining patients¡¯ autonomy, and calls into question the adequacy of the informed consent doctrine. AI may restrict the flow of information between healthcare professionals and patients, amplify information asymmetry, and diminish informed consent as a tool for empowerment. Europe¡¯s AI governance framework, particularly the EU AI Act, fails to address these challenges satisfactorily; health-specific regulation and enhanced AI literacy are needed. To safeguard informed consent in the AI era, the right to information must be strengthened and the required level of explainability defined.

• Sverdrup, Tone (2025). Juristskapt virkelighet i familieretten. I Arnesen, Finn; Lohne, Kjersti; Michalsen, Dag & Sand, Inger Johanne (Red.), Rettsvitenskap og samfunnsengasjement: Festskrift til Hans Petter Graver. Universitetsforlaget. ISSN 9788215075297. s. 450¨C462. Vis sammendrag

  Nasjonalt vitenarkiv

• Baste, ?ystein Fl?; Cyndecka, Malgorzata Agnieszka; Esayas, Samson Yoseph; Langford, Malcolm; Lison, Pierre & Weitzenboeck, Emily Mary (2025). Open Justice Data in Europe: A Patchwork. Social Science Research Network (SSRN). doi: https:/download.ssrn.com/2025/5/30/5207840.pdf?response-content-disposition=inline&X-Amz-Security-Token=IQoJb3JpZ2luX2VjEJP%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2FwEaCXVzLWVhc3QtMSJGMEQCIBlmvG4SYRNfDcqmT9diQar3bOtQskuBa0KzqGhZGSQEAiAFPk6dw0kPu4hvzmxN3%2FzA5%2Ba%2BmYUQ%2FD9vVQA30%2FoCiiq9BQhbEAQaDDMwODQ3NTMwMTI1NyIMPAzGXKwDSnZ17MntKpoFiUaB%2BlXq%2FRZtHqQO78eDvkWaKtY9wECPt0QSf4lZj7z8R7Hq4XKa8jD6L7ngdGT%2BzFgluNgFkZzLBU8ZlJdiS4Rhxa6NtMbswxJj6Rh5cTo49ItLOMOzkm9TERQm1W%2BaqlYYgjFzYhg4BXmsf0uIjSaQBBqSEy4zZcy%2BGw2UhRaNZnX6G2Gb3Jp0SLm%2BwvUx4PRIp0et6W%2BAUU7PvED5%2BUC%2BbfNpm9BWVr9xMPeeQyjQ%2BA37gXxwrSv6jjTnzMCbHTIfNx4LfQNUfIixD0qN11eD8OUJnQrWWhiK7%2BaFeQwgLQA5hYN%2BhWiKEYEBDrTlLZBWvy1Te2v6Bo1pdA8LOycTw9o2j3QkyF91J5hvfkWVJeLdlkt3f6nnvNOHA5bj0p2xufdIknRuzywaebSvliM46TmC3FoLfhHFkI5ZCSW6C%2FRz%2BRnccS%2BeALgJXQHda0bf4imVXWqftCK%2FhfZkgMHTFadAiiqCdOB01TNaqJILeDjoBctkS6jdHwzX95h7aMTKB8p2g6QLsScS2%2FRscsqBNA2Li7cKGDeKLvSpdeqOxcdwBntx%2Flzz2j5mGwkRGg2Ap5Zvey33oAUPg2gDQmflZQxjE0uGEEHaIdC0HLWeUib3FL1Uysri1S5C6j67OYJkfefgTlCIRKNQxI8sDy0Px1siUDHRkEgFjwuqXKTzjyAPhL%2Bnzg3O0B0iXwaRIBprJ0HsugmQAgEWR3faEm5G89JPi3gbQilKSfTFnAnQ6uIR9g15Z4HMlgc7y8DkgmqH7FzVK2WS7rOSpTn4X4LfX3MB%2FpOnwHiSevr%2BgLOhyAkV%2BeZpTVga7fN6UjEVQqjksBonpXZf0cVQ6Mct9RFuBGCFNK48iwM2CrN94dWHB9WI26qbW2SWMLXdyskGOrIBM8dj6BevkrkKkAlBXQ%2F42zkLAC2X5ix63W1KL0Ylv4f3pZLGokVq39bpnnq8%2FPWwbNMHNoaeqB83s7qdeSTa38%2F3FL9dL4D3%2F3S6%2BTF7AaF0Snkz5IS0p7qplrEMktuP30639VvG1qiB6jBsvG5fMqA5fz%2BlBP8BLykef2ieAoS%2FAyGxj%2BhQjgLyu5rKO3iM93ypIQq%2BLxTA42pDYkOH8wQk7gEpLprW1i3Gu%2B3xibaQnA%3D%3D&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Date=20251205T103943Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=300&X-Amz-Credential=ASIAUPUUPRWEWF6ETYH2%2F20251205%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Signature=6f5ede6ef4b5bdc1cd802032c050b1a225fb32296ebd358bfd539bcb2290ef9a&abstractId=5207840. Vis sammendrag

  The publication of court judgments is essential to upholding rule of law and democratic norms as well as facilitating legal research, and new legal technologies. However, many European states struggled to transition to online publication at scale. In this article we address three questions: what are the obligations of states to publish judgments; which states are making progress; and what are the challenges and solutions in ensuring greater publicity? We examine the overarching duties in the ECHR and EU law and the relevant legal requirements and practice in 12 national jurisdictions and two regional courts. Our findings show tremendous variation in duties and practice, and identify barriers to progress (legal, organisational, and budgetary) but also promising innovative solutions in certain jurisdictions. Ultimately, while this publication diversity provides a form of experimental governance, it would be timely to move towards common standards and approaches.

• R?s?g, Erik (2025). Den norske l?ren om objektiv proforma. I Bull, Hans Jacob; B?cklund, Agneta; Herre, Johnny; Ramberg, Christina & Schelin, Johan (Red.), Festskrift till Svante O. Johansson. Jure. ISSN 9789172239685.
• ?sterud, Eirik (2025). Konkurranselovens EU-harmoniserte inngrepsvilk?r for foretakssammenslutninger og s?rtrekk ved minoritetserverv. Tidsskrift for forretningsjus. ISSN 0805-4355. 31(1), s. 39¨C39. doi: 10.18261/tff.31.1.5.
• Stokke, Sander (2025). Not as special: The Court's decision on the risk of a breach of the Charter following surrender to the United Kingdom in Case C-202/24 Alchaster. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law (MJ). ISSN 1023-263X. doi: 10.1177/1023263x251376884. Vis sammendrag

  This note examines the Court of Justice's ruling in the Alchaster case concerning judicial authorities¡¯ assessment of the risk of a breach of fundamental rights following surrender to the United Kingdom. The Court of Justice denied the application of the principle of mutual trust to the surrender procedure established by the Trade and Cooperation Agreement, despite having applied the principle to the surrender agreement with Norway and Iceland. A ¡®particular¡¯ reason for the inapplicability of mutual trust is that the UK is not part of the ¡®European area without internal borders¡¯. Norway is part of that area by virtue of implementing the Schengen acquis and participating in the internal market through the EEA Agreement. The Court ruled that the UK does not have ¡®as special¡¯ a relationship with the EU as Norway does. Since the principle of mutual trust does not apply to the TCA surrender procedure, judicial authorities cannot use the two-step test from the Aranyosi and C?ld?raru to determine if the Charter prevents surrender. Instead, judicial authorities must conduct an independent review following the Court¡¯s approach in cases concerning extradition to third states.

• Skj?nberg, Alexander S. (2025). Restrictions on the Right to Strike in Norway. I Waas, Berndt (Red.), Restrictions on the Right to Strike. International law and national laws in Europe. Kluwer Law International. ISSN 9789403525198. s. 319¨C330.
• Skj?nberg, Alexander S. (2025). Philipp Lotmar og hans betydning for utviklingen av arbeidsrett. I Sandvik, P?l Thonstad; Ekberg, Espen & ?ksendal, Lars Fredrik Moe (Red.), Skarpe briller og bitre piller, Festskrift til Harald Espeli og Finn Erhard Johannessen. Bokstav og bilde AS. ISSN 9788230369449. s. 236¨C255.

Se alle arbeider i NVA

• Gjems-Onstad, Ole; Mikelsen, Anders Bernhard; Dyrnes, Cecilie Aasprong; Kristensen, Roy & Kildal, Tor S. (2025). L?rebok i merverdiavgift. Gyldendal Norsk Forlag A/S. ISBN 9788205603806. 384 s.
• Boele-Woelki, Katharina; J?nter?-Jareborg, Maarit & Sverdrup, Tone (2025). What Family Law for Europe? Larcier. ISBN 9781839705489. 280 s. Vis sammendrag

  In what ways does contemporary European family law respond to evolving societal dynamics and the growing imperative to uphold human rights? This volume addresses this question by taking a crossnational, comparative approach, presenting research that examines how family law norms are shaped across Europe. The publication stems from a landmark scholarly conference held in Stockholm in October 2024 ¡ª the first of its kind to bring together a wide network of family law scholars and research groups from across Europe. In the spirit of enhancing a transnational dialogue and mutual understanding, several of the most pressing legal issues are identified and analysed using refined methodological approaches. Three central themes have emerged as focal points for ongoing and future enquiry: 1. The transformation of parent-child relationships, particularly in relation to new forms of assisted reproductive technology (ART), with a focus on the interests of the child (to be born) and shifting definitions of legal parentage. 2. The legal recognition of gender and new forms of adult relationships, including non-romantic and community-based arrangements. 3. Enhancing legal protections against domestic violence with a particular focus on safeguarding the rights and well-being of children. This volume contributes to the development of a more coherent and principled European family law system, based on comparative research and shared normative principles. It provides an invaluable source of inspiration and reference for academics, legal professionals and policymakers dedicated to advancing family law in an evolving Europe.

Se alle arbeider i NVA

• R?s?g, Erik (2052). Pantsettelse og kreditorbeslag av klimakvoter.
• Evju, Stein (2025). Fortsatt strid p? tv? plan om Norges bemanningsregler - EU och Arbetsr?tt. EU & arbetsr?tt. ISSN 1402-3008. 2025(4), s. 5¨C5. Vis sammendrag

  ? Striden om de norska begr?nsningarna av bemanningsarbete g?r vidare och nu p? tv? plan. Tingsr?ttsdomen som friade norska staten (se EU & arbetsr?tt nr 3/25 s. 3) har ?verklagats, och nu har ocks? Eftas ?vervakningsmyndighet (ESA) ?ter tagit upp saken som bordlades 2023 (se EU & arbetsr?tt nr 1/23 s.4 och 3/23 s. 2). [¡­]

• Teoh, King Men (2025). Do the EU and Norway's Regulatory Frameworks drive towards a circular EV battery value chain? doi: https:/uit.no/nyheter/artikkel/kortnytt?p_document_id=907189. Vis sammendrag

  Presented at the PhD Panel Presentation

• Teoh, King Men (2025). The Circularity Imperative: A Comparative Analysis of Norway¡¯s Policy and the EU Battery Regulation. doi: https:/www.jus.uio.no/english/research/areas/sustainabilitylaw/events/2025/phd-seminar-2025/programme-phd-seminar-2025-version-of-15-october-2025.pdf. Vis sammendrag

  Delivered a presentation during the PhD Panel Presentations, Session 4, focusing on Sustainable Corporate Governance and Sustainable Transport.

• Teoh, King Men (2025). Pillars of the Green Transition: The Legal Imperative for a Circular EV Battery Value Chain. doi: https:/www.uio.no/english/research/strategic-research-areas/uio-energy-and-environment/news-and-events/events/2025/Pictures/presentations-from-ee-forum-2025/3.-pitching_king-men_uio-energy-forum.pdf. Vis sammendrag

  The Energy and Environment Forum 2025 was held on September 25 as an interdisciplinary conference examining the green transition from diverse perspectives, featuring contributions from UiO researchers, students, and external contributors. I was selected to participate in the Student Pitching Competition.

• Teoh, King Men (2025). Batteries of the Future: A Perspective from Young Scientists in Europe. doi: https:/battery2030.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Manifesto-2025-FINAL.pdf.
• Melteig, Elina; Lintvedt, Mona Naomi & T?rresen, Jim (2025). Selv luftm?leren kan avsl?re en hjemmefest. Derfor er roboter i hjemmet perfekte verkt?y for overv?kere. - Titan.uio.no. [Internet]. Titan.uio.no. doi: https:/www.titan.uio.no/teknologi/2025/roboter-i-hjemmet-utfordrer-personvernet.html. Vis sammendrag

  ¨C Uavhengig av hva som er intensjonen, f?r man mindre privatliv med roboter i hjemmet, sier forsker. Men det finnes noen r?d for bedre personvern.?

• Sandvik, Kristin Bergtora & Lintvedt, Mona Naomi (2025). The dark side of genomic commercialisation: bankruptcy, acquisitions and novel data protection violations. doi: https:/www.jus.uio.no/ikrs/english/research/projects/digitaldna/events/program-biodata-surveillance-and-society.html. Vis sammendrag

  Spring 2025, the bankruptcy of the DNA company 23andMe garnered headlines globally, with commentators, policymakers, and regulators warning customers to ¡®delete their data¡¯. Although 23andMe's business model proved unprofitable, its extensive genomic database holds significant value for technology firms, law enforcement, and researchers. However, this bankruptcy was just the latest in a long line of startups and technology ventures focusing on commercial genomics, to undergo radical disruption of services or business models. Notably, this trend is also evident in reproductive health, with several clinics declaring bankruptcy. These clinics store not only genetic and health data, but also embryos and donor sperm, raising substantial privacy concerns when their operations falter. This market has also drawn the interest of private equity firms through their acquisitions of DNA databases and IVF clinics. Bankruptcy proceedings, mergers, and acquisitions pose new risks to privacy and data protection, often in ways not anticipated by existing laws and regulations. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, combining sociolegal methods, critical data studies, and legal analysis of commercial and data protection law, this paper will explore these emerging challenges by presenting a taxonomy of novel data violations. It will survey recent cases and examples that illustrate the dark side of the intersection between commercialisation, market failure, and privacy concerns.

• Lintvedt, Mona Naomi (2025). AIA og GDPR: Som olje og vann? doi: https:/www.jus.uio.no/ifp/om/organisasjon/seri/arrangementer/2025/personvernkonferansen-2025.html.
• Lintvedt, Mona Naomi (2025). ?pnet muligheter for fremtiden - Universitetet i Innlandet. [Internet]. Universitetet i Innlandet. doi: https:/www.inn.no/studier/studenthistorier/juss-psykologi-og-samfunnsfag/speedating-for-jusstudenter/index.html. Vis sammendrag

  Tidenes f?rste Speed-Networking for jusstudenter er ble en suksess da det ble arrangert p? Lillehammer for f?rste gang.

• Melteig, Elina & Lintvedt, Mona Naomi (2025). Er algoritmestyrt velferd en fattigdomsfelle? - Titan.uio.no. [Internet]. Titan.uio.no. doi: https:/www.titan.uio.no/teknologi/2025/digitalisering-og-ki-er-algoritmestyrt-velferd-en-.html. Vis sammendrag

  ¨C Store KI-skandaler i europeiske land viser tydelig hvilke skader feil bruk av kunstig intelligens kan gj?re. S?rlig overfor s?rbare grupper, sier forsker Naomi Lintvedt.

• Davis, Peter Alexander Earls & Schmidt, Rebecca (2025). Standardised bias? The role ¨C and limits ¨C of European standards bodies in the EU¡¯s Artificial Intelligence Act | Internet Policy Review. Vis sammendrag

  Article 10 of the EU¡¯s AI Act puts data governance at the heart of bias mitigation in high-risk AI systems but offers little guidance on implementation. Delegating these challenges to technical standardisation bodies raises both feasibility and legitimacy concerns, posing a significant test for the institutions now tasked with defining AI fairness in practice.

• Giertsen, Johan Randulf Petter; Omland, Lars Petter Halvorsen & Wold, Vebj?rn (2025). Uforklarlig taust fra husleielovutvalget om E?S. Vis sammendrag

  Det fremst?r uforklarlig at utvalget ikke ser hen til den omfattende europeiske forbrukerretten som binder statsmaktene etter E?S-avtalen.

• Hjort, Live Sunniva (2025). A Patient Rights Perspective on Explainability in Healthcare: Is the Patient in the Dark?
• Evju, Stein (2025). Minstel?nnsdirektivet. Direktivet, annullasjonss?ksm?let og dommen. E?S-relevans og norske perspektiver.
• Evju, Stein (2025). Fra G¨¦n¨¨ve til Haag: ILO C 87 (1948) og streikerett til ICJ. Saken, bakgrunn ¨C og norske perspektiver.
• Asland, John (2025). Avd?des gjeldsforpliktelser ved d?dsboskifte.
• Korsnes, Kristine Helen (2025). KI p? ?jussisk?. En praksisfortelling om arbeid med implementering av KI p? masterstudiet i rettsvitenskap.
• R?s?g, Erik (2025). Digital tinglysing.
• Sunde, J?rn ?yrehagen & Graver, Hans Petter (2025). Slik beg?r du statskupp. [Journal]. Advokatbladet. doi: https:/www.advokatbladet.no/hans-petter-graver-jorn-oyrehagen-sunde-presset-pa-rettsstaten/slik-begar-du-statskupp/230771.
• R?s?g, Erik (2025). The governing bodies in respect of autonomous shipping ¨C which have a say?
• Irgens-Jensen, Harald (2025). Plausiblitetssp?rsm?let i patentretten ¨C en norsk kommentar til Ebba Billing. NIR : Nordiskt immateriellt r?ttsskydd. ISSN 0027-6723. 2, s. 168¨C173. Vis sammendrag

  Artikkelen kommenterer og supplerer artikkelen "Plausibilitet och till?tligheten av efterpublicerad data efter EPO:s stora besv?rskammares avg?rande i m?l G2/21" i Nordiskt Immateriellt R?ttsskydd 2024 s. 155 flg., forfattet av Ebba Billing. Temaet er det s?kalte "plausibilitetssp?rsm?let" i patentretten, om i hvilken grad en patents?knad m? faktisk underbygge at oppfinnelsen l?ser et teknisk problem.

• R?s?g, Erik (2025). Salgspant og leasing.
• R?s?g, Erik (2025). IMO and EU Measures to Reduce GHG Emissions from Shipping -- Who Pays in the End?
• Korsnes, Kristine Helen (2025). Reimagining Legal Peadagogy: 21st Century Skills in the Age of AI. Summing up.
• Korsnes, Kristine Helen (2025). Embracing AI in legal education?
• Teoh, King Men (2025). Pillars of the Green Transition: Regulatory Architects and The Legal Imperative for a Circular EV Battery Value Chain. doi: https:/www.erscp2025.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/ERSCP-2025-programme-final_250912.pdf. Vis sammendrag

  Abstract accepted for presentation at Policy Levers and Legal Pathways for a Circular Economy: Legal Instruments and Incentives for Reuse, Repair, and Resource Responsibility.

• B?, ?yvind (2025). Fri bevegelighet for personer i E?S - i lys av storkammerdommen HR-2025-490-S MH.
• B?, ?yvind (2025). Fri bevegelighet for personer i E?S - i lys av storkammerdommen HR-2025-490-S MH.
• Irgens-Jensen, Harald (2025). Sitatrett, opphavsrett og jus - hva kan vi bruke? Vis sammendrag

  Foredrag p? Lyddager 2025, Norges st?rste radio- og podkastkonferanse

• Asland, John (2025). Arverettslig oppdatering.
• Asland, John (2025). Pater est for kvinner og andre tredjemannskonflikter. Tidsskrift for familierett, arverett og barnevernrettslige sp?rsm?l. ISSN 1503-2965. 23(3), s. 167¨C169. doi: 10.18261/fab.23.3.1.
• R?s?g, Erik (2025). COLREG Compliance and MASS.
• Meyer, Johannes Hygen (2025). Erstatning for ikke-?konomisk tap - et rettshistorisk tilbakeblikk.
• Meyer, Johannes Hygen (2025). Opening remarks - Book launch, Chernykh&Karton (2025) Research methods in contract law and scholarship.
• Neves, Maria Madalena Rolhas Fernandes Das; Macchi, Chiara & Morfea, Chiara (2025). Ensuring a Just Transition for People and the Planet: Regulatory Challenges in Extractives Industries. Vis sammendrag

  This hybrid event explored the legal and regulatory challenges surrounding extractive industries in the context of the energy transition, with a focus on deep-sea mining, corporate due diligence, and the rights of Indigenous communities affected by renewable energy and mining projects.

• R?s?g, Erik (2025). Bel?nte Kjetils eiendom med millioner: ¨C Ble ikke spurt. [Journal]. E24. doi: https:/e24.no/boers-og-finans/i/W0nmjj/belaante-kjetils-eiendom-med-millioner-ble-ikke-spurt.
• Salvesen, Sverre Magnus Bergslid (2025). HR-2025-921-A Nye Jordal Amfi. Nytt i privatretten : nyhetsbrev for informasjon p? det privatret. ISSN 1501-9594. Vis sammendrag

  Artikkelen gir et sammendrag og en analyse av prejudikatrekkevidden til HR-2025-921-A

Se alle arbeider i NVA