- Which research project are you currently working on the most?
I am currently involved in the European integration and national law: Compliance in complex institutional orders (COMPLEX) project over at ARENA, Center for European Studies at the University of Oslo. The project focuses on understanding the effects of EU secondary law in national law. In my case I am studying government agencies in Norway.
- What do you want to find out?
Norway has long held a reputation as a “savvy operator”, being a well-adaptive associated non-EU member. So, when instances of noncompliance happen, it raises eyebrows. That's where my research steps in, aiming to shed light on the why behind these compliance blunders. I am diving into the behavioral dynamics in government agencies to investigate the factor that drive noncompliance with EU law. Take for example the case of dumping mining waste in the Fjords, a topic that has sparked significant controversy and even gained attention from the ESA. By examining cases like these, my goal is to piece together the puzzle of uncovering the root causes of compliance failure and paving the way for more effective regulatory frameworks in the future.
- Why is this important?
The cases I am using for my research are “hot topics”, not just in Norway, but all around the world. The disposal of mining waste in the Fjords and the noncompliance with the EU Mining Waste Directive, for instance is a prime example of something we really need to dig into. These situations are very sensitive in a political sense, it is crucial to stay ahead of the curve when it comes to understanding what went down and how we can stop it from happening again. I reckon this research and the project in general could play a big part in better positioning Norway towards the EU by improving the incorporation of EU law. Which ultimately can improve political cooperation, legal certainty, and participation in EU initiatives, benefiting both Norway and the broader European Integration scene.
- Who do you collaborate with?
I am fortunate to be surrounded by a stellar team of colleagues, each bringing their own expertise to the table. Among them is Erik Oddvar Eriksen, our project leader and a renowned professor/researcher at ARENA in the realm of political theory and democratic governance within the EU. Then we have Karin Hjorthen Zelano, which holds a postdoctoral position in the same project, we are currently cowriting a paper on bureaucratic understanding of mandates. Andreas Eriksen, a professor at OsloMet in the area of political philosophy and ethics. Fredrik Hjorthen, a researcher in the “rule of law in NAV: Principled justification” RETTS project (linked to the COMPLEX project) specialized in political theory. Last but not least, Martin Moland a postdoctoral fellow in the RECLAIM project but is also affiliated to the COMPLEX. In a certain way we all have different background which makes our collaboration and discussions nothing short of riveting!
- What do you look for when choosing research partners?
I am drawn to the concept of creating a "melting pot" of academic backgrounds and expertise. I highly value individuals who share similar goals, values, and aspirations for the project but also can offer fresh perspectives from outside the immediate field. For instance, in the workshops held for the COMPLEX project, participated legal and political science scholars, sociologists, and historians. The COMPLEX project serves as a prime example of interdisciplinary collaboration, tackling legal, political and psychological dimensions. While discussions within disciplines are undoubtedly enriching, I find that the most compelling insights come from interdisciplinary exchanges.
- What do you think is the most interesting thing about being a researcher?
For me it is the investigative side of research. It often feels like stepping into the shoes of a detective, solving complex mysteries and piecing together the evidence to uncover the truth. There's a certain thrill in the pursuit of knowledge, connecting the dots and understanding, almost like solving a really good case. But beyond this thrill, there is also a sense of purpose driving my work. Every researcher hopes their work will have an impact, whether it is shining a light on important issues, shaping policies or just adding to our knowledge of the world. It is about making a difference, no matter how small, and that is what keeps me passionate about research.
- What is the most common question you get about your work?
Whenever I mention that my research is about Norway's noncompliance with EU laws, I get these surprised reactions, "Really? In Norway?". Many have this “clean” perception of Norway and sees it as a rule-abiding country. But despite that reputation, my research is finding a different narrative. There seems to be a distinct prioritization of political / governmental interests in Norway, particularly concerning the application of EU laws. It is a delicate balancing act, one where national objectives sometimes clash with those mandated by the EU. And it is these tensions that I am aiming to show through my work.